Navajo Nation’s battle over new uranium projects highlighted


Dorothy Kosich

'23-NOV-06 08:00'
R
ENO, NV (Mineweb.com) --The Los Angeles Times this week concluded a four-part series on the historic impacts of uranium mining on the Navajo, and the Navajo Nation’s renewed efforts to ban new uranium extraction projects in New Mexico near their tribal borders.

From 1944 to 1986, 3.9 million tons of uranium ore was mined in Navajo county, a reservation spanning Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, with a current population of more than 180,000 people.

The federal government was the only customer of the uranium, which was used for the Manhattan Project and for the weapons stockpile during the days of the Cold War with the Soviet Bloc nations. By the 1960s, more than 1,000 mines and few processing mills on tribal land were shut. Many were never reclaimed, leaving behind radioactive waste and open tunnels and pits.

Considerable portions of the mill tailings and ore found their way into ovens, cisterns, fireplaces, floors and walls as the Navajo used a considerable amount for building materials. From 1984 to 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy spent $240 million to cover tailings at old uranium mills. Federally funded remediation programs have continued on and off since then.

Recently, the U.S. EPA concluded that chronic exposure to radiation levels from uranium mines in Red Valley, Arizona, could lead to bone, liver and breast cancers in Red Valley residents, who have been complaining about the situation since the 1980s.

Mining and exploration companies have returned to stake claims, buy mineral rights, and apply for permits next Navajo homelands. Navajo County, which covers some 27,000 square miles, is considered the Saudi Arabia of uranium. Miners say they will extract uranium through an environmentally safe chemical process, known as in situ leaching, which doesn’t require blasting, pits, or result in lasting contamination.

Navajo Nation officials, however, are not convinced. Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley convinced the tribal council last year to pass a ban on mining or uranium processing in their lands. Through executive order, Shirley prohibited tribal employees from having any communications with uranium companies or their representatives.

The Navajo President recently won re-election, becoming the first Navajo leader to win back-to-back terms since 1982. Ironically, Shirley’s campaign focused on economic development, including development of a coal-fired power plant that would generate more than $50 million annually in taxes and royalties for the Navajo, and six casinos.

The Times reported that the tribal government is trying to block project financing for uranium projects. Meanwhile, a dispute is ongoing between New Mexico regulators and the Navajo Nation. State officials have been granted primacy for New Mexico’s regulatory program by the EPA. However, uranium mining activities on Navajo lands are governed and permitted by the U.S. government through EPA.

U.S. and Canadian uranium exploration and mining companies have the backing of New Mexico Senator Pete Domenici, a Republican, who is soon to be the former chairman of the Senate Energy Committee as the Senate Majority Leadership comes under democratic control. The mining companies also have support from the Bush Administration, which is advocating nuclear power and other alternatives to oil.

Texas-based Uranium Resource Inc. is hoping to begin uranium mining on a test basis in the township of Church Rock, New Mexico, by 2008. If its results prove to be environmentally watertight, the company would then seek to mine in and around nearby Crownpoint, a town which is located on the largest known undeveloped U.S. uranium deposit. URI has invested more than $25 million, according to the Times.

In the meantime, Canadian junior Strathmore Minerals is advancing permitting for the development of its Church Rock property toward in-situ production.


 

originally found at Mine Web

        


Reprinted as an historical reference document under the Fair Use doctrine of international copyright law. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html